Königstiger platoon boxed set: a review

0
  

Chris has been spending his pennies again, this time on King Tigers for our next AAR.

Please ignore my brainless wanderings about “Henschel” and “Porsche turrets”.  I would like to clarify that, after further post-production research, we realise that 2 turret designs were used in production vehicles. The initial design is sometimes misleadingly called the “Porsche” turret due to the belief that it was designed by Porsche for their prototype.  The Porsche turret had a rounded front and steeply sloped sides with a curved bulge on the turret’s left side to accommodate the commander’s cupola. The more common “production” turret, sometimes called the “Henschel” turret, was simplified with a significantly thicker flat face, no shot trap (created by the curved face of the initial-type turret) and less-steeply sloped sides which prevented the need for a bulge for the commander’s cupola.

 

Thanks to Wikipedia for sorting that one out.  If that hasn’t worked for you, don’t worry, just turn the sound down and watch the pictures :)

Every cloud…

0
  

With the demise of Maelstrom Games as a provider of Battlefront Miniatures, they’re discounting their entire FoW range by 25%. 

If you’re a Dad with pocket money to spare, go wild in the aisles:

BATTLEFRONT-STOCK

To use this voucher simply register at Maelstrom’s webstore, select the items you want and copy and paste the code into the appropriate field in your basket. Press ‘REDEEM’ and the webstore will do the rest.

Eye of the Storm (updated 25/02/11) @ 20:59

0
  

I nearly choked on my museli when I read Battlefront’s announcement that they’d  ceased supplying UK retailer Maelstrom Games with immediate effect.  Maelstrom Games are my preferred supplier.  A one stop mail-order shop for the lonelier wargaming corners of the country, if you will. 

Speculation and comment is rife over why Battlefront have pulled the plug.  Maelstrom’s MD, Rob Lane, enigmatically commented on TGN,

Hi guys,

We’ll be making a statement later on today, or possibly tomorrow. You will be amazed when you hear what has happened.

Cheers

Rob Lane
MD, Maelstrom Games

With no further comment being made at present, I thought I’d share what I know.  After all, I was getting itchy as I’ve got some pre-orders I wanted clarification on. 

Noting that all of Maelstrom’s FoW stock was now labelled ”Whilst Stocks Last’, I rang them this morning to be informed that news on whether they would be able to honour existing pre-orders would be clarified after 14:00.  I was left with the impression that some stock might still be coming in, despite Battlefront’s statement to the contrary.  I pressed to find out more, but was advised to ring back later.

At a little before 15:00, I received an email from Maelstrom informing me of the following:

In reference to order #***********, we have refunded £**.** to your Moneyback, for the items ********** ********** and ******** ********** ************.

We have done this because the item(s) are no longer available.

We have refunded to your Moneyback because it is quick and easy and has the additional benefit that it reduces bank charges for both sides. If you would like us to refund to your original payment method, please let us know and we will be happy to do so.

Personally, I don’t like Moneyback or credit and  feel it’s a little bit cheeky to offer it up as your first line so I asked for a refund via my original payment method.  But all that’s by the by.

A little after 16:00 I rang again to ask why: why was all this going on?  After a little hesistation, the warehousing assistant I spoke to said that all the staff were just about to go in to a staff meeting to find out what was going on and that their MD would post an explantion on a couple of website shortly.

So, there you go.  A worm’s eye view of a retail spat.  Bit of a shame really.  I don’t know what I think it means about the state of the hobby.  All I know is that I’ve had to rummage around this evening to find alternative suppliers with relevant stock who are prepared to retail it at a price comparable to Maelstrom. 

Who said the consumer was King?

Update 25/02/11 @ 11:37:

Posted on TGN:

Guys,
I appreciate all the comments here and a public statement about what has happened with Battlefront Miniatures will be made today. I’m just waiting for our solicitor to look it over before I publish it.

To all those here who have had bad experiences with Maelstrom Games, feel free to contact us at any time to discuss what has happened with your order and why it has happened. We are only human and we do make mistakes, but it is how we deal with those mistakes that counts. If we have fallen down on anything than I apologise. Please contact us and, if your complaint is genuine, we will do something about it.

I do find it quite amusing that a moan about us is immediately followed by a plug for Wayland. I wonder who posted that! It’s not even subtle.

Please, Wayland Games employees and fanboys, you will profit from Battlefront’s decision regardless of whether you post silly comments about us on public forums. At least, until you don’t “toe the line”. Please try to remain professional, you simply end up looking silly.

Our “tiny warehouse” holds around £500,000 worth of stock, so it can’t be that tiny. Our stock levels are indeed live, and if anybody wishes to visit and see our stock levels in the flesh we are more than happy to accommodate you. We don’t allow many people in our warehouse, usually only manufacturers, because obviously that is our workplace, but if “Dangerous” lets us know who he is I can tell you whether he’s seen it or not.

We are not in the business of deceiving people, we are honest and straightforward, and we do not have infinity stock levels, which is plainly ridiculous.

Regardless, thank you to those who have posted kind comments about us, it is always appreciated.

Cheers

Rob Lane
MD, Maelstrom Games

Just spoken to Maelstrom myself and a statement will be due imminently.

At 17:55, I think I’m becoming offically  obsessed with this.  I can hardly wait for the latest update:

Guys

Thank you all for your comments on my recent post.

I would simply like to say that Maelstrom as a company have honourable intentions at all times, and we do not intentionally create problems for our customers in terms of stock and if we make any mistakes it is because we are human.

We remain a very healthy business, but sometimes when reading negative comments made on public forums old, current and potential customers must understand that 99% of our customers do not post anything positive about us because, effectively, we have done our job. We sent well over 120,000 packages last year worldwide; we must be doing something right.

Bear in mind, too, that we have a dedicated customer support team that aims to respond to all e-mails within 24 hours and answer phone calls when they are made. Usually we can resolve any problem very quickly, and a lot of the time problems occur through our use of other companies – such as Royal Mail and in turn local post services. I’m sure anyone who runs a mail order company will understand this. It is frustrating because immediately a package does not turn up, we are blamed, when 99% of the time it is simply not our fault. Regardless, we will correct any mistakes that postal services make immediately, at cost to ourselves.

I’m sure you have all read Matt Wilson (head of Privateer Press)’s comments on his company’s production shortcomings; sometimes, we cannot provide stock because we cannot get hold of it ourselves. Yet, of course, it is ultimately us that are responsible for that, and we do try to hold enough stock and swallow all of these problems because we are not, when all is said and done, whiners. This post is a rare example of me explaining the problems we face because I do believe, like Phillip, to keep quiet and carry on. Perhaps I am getting less professional in my old age.

As Phillip states, it is usually the best policy to never air your dirty washing in public. In this case, however, I feel it is justified that we make a public statement regarding what has happened as I feel we have been very badly treated indeed and I do not want anybody to think Battlefront have dropped us because we have done anything wrong, illegal or against the terms of any contract.

When we publish our public statement, it may show you all the pressures that retailers are put under by manufacturers, which most of the time we swallow, and within it you may realise that on many occasions it is simply not our fault that we cannot get stock to you on time.

Regardless, I thank all of you that have shopped with us in the past and hopefully you will all continue to do so.

Cheers

Rob Lane
MD, Maelstrom Games

And then this at 17:07 on the NEWS aspect of Maelstrom’s site:

I have written a statement regarding the decision by Battlefront Miniatures to cease trading with Maelstrom Games. Needless to say, this was a bit of a shock on Thursday morning when I found out and I feel it is necessary to respond to the mounting speculation on the internet regarding their decision. Let me reassure you all that I feel we have done absolutely nothing wrong in terms of any law or any contract we have signed, and that we feel we have been treated quite unfairly.

Public Statement Regarding Battlefront Miniatures 

Firstly, I make no apologies for the length of this statement. It’s a statement of how I personally feel about the situation we find ourselves in and how Maelstrom Games as a company conducts itself. We do try to keep all the problems and annoyances with suppliers and manufacturers to ourselves, simply because it is the professional thing to do and because our customers come first – we swallow it so they don’t have to worry!

That being said, I feel that in this instance the customer needs to know what has happened to understand how this situation has occurred and to ensure Maelstrom Games’ good name does not become sullied by speculation. We believe that we have been completely honourable in all of our trading with Battlefront Miniatures and have tried to do business with them honourably.

I hope you will all read this statement without any prejudice to either party and come to your own decisions as to what has happened.

Let me reassure our customers that this will not affect Maelstrom Games’ health as a company and we will continue to grow and offer more and more excellent wargaming product in 2011.

There you have it! What a shame…

But, and at the risk of seeming vulgar, check out the 25% discount!

Rule Conundrum #1 (updated 26/02/11)

0
  

Here’s a conundrum for you :)

Imagine you’re playing a game against your friendly neighbourhood opponent, in this case, in the kitchen.  Not that the kitchen is relevant to this conundrum. It just adds local colour.  Anyway, pans aside it’s not your turn, it’s your opponents.  He’s moving his Panthers around to get a bead on one of your 76mm AT guns. 

After the shunting around has finished and the Shooting phase is declared, your opponent states that he wants to take a pot-shot at 1 of your guns with his tank.  Both teams are on the same elevation.  Smugly, you point out that, since your opponent moved his Panther behind some advancing infantry he cannot shoot through friendly teams,

A team may not shoot through a friendly team.  If you cannot draw a line of sight from your team to any part of the enemy team without passing through a friendly team, you may not shoot at the enemy team (Hardback rulebook, page 55).

Please note, the infantry I am referring to had advanced and, as such, the Panther does not qualify to Shoot Over Friendly Teams,

Any team may shoot over an Infantry or Man-packed Gun team that did not move and will not shoot this turn (Hardback rulebook, page 56).

Quick as you like, your opponent moves the offending infantry team out of the way and takes the shot. 

Bang! 

One failed gun save later and your AT asset is no more :(

Your opponent looks you earnestly in the face and rationalises his move as follows.  Since no shots had been fired it’s OK to revert to the Movement phase and adjust positioning to enable the shoot to take place.

How would you react? :)  

(I’ll let you know how it turned out after you’ve expressed your views!).

Parental Warning: No friendships will be harmed by replying to this post.  The two opponents in this game bear no relationship to any wargamers living or undead :)

Pottering with pastels and pigments 2/2

0
  

I haven’t had an easy ride with pigments.  I like the outcome, but I’ve found them messy to work with and quite frustrating.  Too little and you don’t see them.  Too much and you obliterate the details.  I remember working with a Tamiya weathering set only to loose the final effect by matt varnishing it.

I’ve often wondered about just reverting to painting weathering effects and leaving it at that :) . What’s frustrated me recently is fixing the pigment.  My models are for gaming, not display.  If I don’t fix the pigments, the constant handling during a game diminishes the effect.  I use MiG pigment fixer to ‘glue’ my pigment in place.

The trouble is, what looks good before fixing, sometimes looks less so after.  The fixer often darkens the original colour, diluting the overall effect.  This is complicated by the colour of the basecoat.  Pigments that look good on dunkelgelb (Vallejo 118 Middlestone) don’t always work on (Vallejo 096) Russian Green. Paradoxically, and after I’ve completed most of my Soviet tanks, I thought I’d conduct an experiment.  I’d brush 5 commonly used MiG Pigments onto a old model sprayed Russian Green and see how the colour changed after the fixer had been applied.  In this way, the pressure was off.  I wasn’t working on a final model and I could see what worked and what didn’t.  I also wanted to reassure myself that the pastels I’d recently bought could be fixed in the same way.

From left to right, we have the Conté 31 Bordeux and 80 Vandyke Brown, then MiG P025 Standard Rust, P232 Dry Mud, P028 Europe Dust, P033 Dark Mud, P034 Russian Earth and P023 Black Smoke. Before fixer: After fixer: I’m very pleased to note that there’s little change in the opacity and colour of the 3 rust colours, including the pastels.

Nice.

All the remaining pigments have, however, lost a little of their original vibrancy.  Dry Mud pretty much disappears leaving only a feint patina over the base coat.  Europe Dust fairs a little better, leaving a warmer more discernible tone.  Dark Mud retains its colour reasonably well and better than the muted Russian Earth.

Finally, as one might expect, Black Smoke remains, well, opaque but a little…grey(ish). I guess it depends on the effect you like. In practice, my preference has been to use mixtures of the darker colours to weather my tanks, including Dark Mud, Russian Earth and Black Smoke.  When I have used lighter pigments to highlight darker shades, for example Dry Mud or Europe Dust, I’ve found that they don’t show up well after fixer has been applied.  This is particularly true for fine details.Now, it would be useful to repeat this experiment on my next big endeavour: British Armour (basecoat 094 Russian Uniform).